← SenseTech Solutions

Real People. Real Work.

Meet the workers Accord is built for.

Accord isn’t designed for an abstract “disabled user.” It’s designed for Marcus, who processes 40 claims a day with a screen reader. For Jordan, who has always been afraid to admit that the forms simply don’t make sense. For Priya, whose wrists gave out and whose voice became her keyboard. For David, who can see perfectly well — just not at 100% zoom. For Amara, who scans through 50 interface elements before she reaches her first data field. And for Tom, who still wants to work a full shift. Accord supports all six AT paths — screen readers, plain language, voice control, screen magnification, switch access, and eye tracking.

👀
Screen Reader Profile

Marcus

Claims Processor — Workers’ Compensation Board
Low vision since birth NVDA screen reader 12 years in the role Processes ~40 claims/day Braille display user

Before Accord

Marcus has processed claims for over a decade, but the agency’s claims portal has never been updated for accessibility. Every morning, he opens the portal and NVDA announces: “unlabelled field, unlabelled combo box, unlabelled button, unlabelled button.”

He’s built up an elaborate mental map from years of practice — Tab 3 times to reach the claimant ID field, Tab 5 times for the injury category, then Tab 7 more for the date picker. Every new screen requires a fresh session of trial-and-error exploration before he can start actual work.

On average, Marcus takes 22 minutes to process a single complex claim — four times longer than his sighted colleagues. The extra time isn’t due to his disability. It’s the direct result of inaccessible software.

Before — typical session
“unlabelled field” → Tab → “unlabelled field” → Tab → “unlabelled combo box” → attempt value → wrong field → restart navigation…
22 minutes per complex claim
“I know this system better than anyone in the building. But I shouldn’t have to memorize which Tab press gets me to which field just to do my job. That’s not accessibility — that’s memorization.”
— Marcus

After Accord

With Accord’s Screen Reader Mode active, NVDA now announces every element correctly: “Claimant ID, text field, W hyphen 4 8 2 0 1”. Marcus tabs through the form at full speed — no guessing, no trial and error.

Accord’s live sync means that when the form validates and shows an error, NVDA reads the error message immediately — something the original portal never surfaced. Marcus catches mistakes on the first pass rather than discovering them at submission.

His claim processing time dropped from 22 minutes to under 3 minutes for complex claims. He now consistently leads his team in throughput — not despite his use of a screen reader, but because Accord finally let him work at full speed.

After — with Accord
NVDA: “Claimant ID, text field” → Tab → “Injury Category, combo box, collapsed” → Alt+Down → select → Tab → “Date of Injury, date picker”…
2.4 minutes per complex claim — 91% reduction
“The first day I used Accord, I finished my morning queue by 11am. That had never happened before in 12 years. I didn’t know that was possible with this software.”
— Marcus, two weeks after Accord deployment
Accord — Screen Reader Mode — Marcus
New Claim
History
Reports
W-48201
Claimant ID — text field — focused
Musculoskeletal — Spine
NVDA: “Claimant ID, text field, W hyphen 4 8 2 0 1, selected all”
📚
Plain Language Profile

Jordan

HR Coordinator — Regional Healthcare Network
Dyslexia ADHD (inattentive type) 5 years in HR Processes benefits & leave forms College diploma

Before Accord

Jordan has been terrified of the HR benefits portal since she started the job. The forms are dense with legal citations, passive constructions, and multi-part sentences that she has to re-read three or four times before she even knows what’s being asked.

Her ADHD means losing her place mid-paragraph happens constantly — and there are no visual cues to help her re-orient. She’s submitted incomplete forms, got them returned, and spent entire afternoons trying to figure out what she missed. She’s never told her manager why.

She developed workarounds: she prints forms, annotates them by hand, and then transfers the data back to the screen. It takes three times as long as it should and she burns through paper. She does it because it’s the only way she can actually follow what the form is asking.

Original form text
“Pursuant to Policy HR-114(c), the employee must provide attestation of continuous absence in excess of three (3) consecutive working days, exclusive of statutory holidays, within five (5) business days of the commencement of such absence, failing which the leave application shall be deemed invalid.”
“I read that sentence four times and I still didn’t know what to do. I called the policy office. They told me it means ‘submit within 5 days.’ Why can’t it just say that?”
— Jordan

After Accord

With Accord’s Plain Language Mode, Jordan sees the same portal — but every instruction has been rewritten. The form is broken into four clearly-labelled steps. Each section has its own colour. The progress indicator shows “Step 2 of 4.”

The dense policy citation above now reads: “If you were absent for more than 3 working days in a row, submit this form within 5 business days. Do not count public holidays.” Jordan reads it once and knows exactly what to do.

She stopped printing forms the first week. Her error rate on returned submissions dropped to zero. Most meaningfully: she told her manager she has dyslexia — for the first time in five years — because Accord made her feel like the problem was the software, not her.

Accord plain language rewrite
“If you were absent for more than 3 working days in a row, submit this form within 5 business days. Do not count public holidays.”
67% shorter — 100% of the information retained
“It felt like someone had finally translated the forms into English. I realized the forms were the problem, not me. That sounds small but it changed everything about how I felt at work.”
— Jordan, six weeks after Accord deployment
Plain Language Mode — Jordan
Step 2 of 4 — Leave Dates
Enter the first and last day you were absent. Use the calendar or type the date.
Nov 4, 2025
End date…
◀ Back
Next ▶
🎤
Voice Control Profile

Priya

Legal Assistant — Thornbury & Associates
RSI — both wrists Dragon NaturallySpeaking 16 8 years in legal Drafts 15+ documents/day Voice-first workflow

Before Accord

Priya’s repetitive strain injury made sustained keyboard and mouse use impossible. She switched to Dragon NaturallySpeaking in 2021. Her voice became her primary input — but the firm’s document management system was never designed for it.

Every interactive element is labelled “Button,” “Button,” “Link.” Dragon can’t distinguish between them. To click anything specific, Priya says “show numbers,” waits for overlays to appear across every element, identifies the right number, and says it. For each action. On a busy drafting day, she issues 200+ navigation commands just to move between menus and fields — on top of the dictation itself.

The system that was supposed to give her independence in the office had made every workflow slower and more frustrating than before.

Before — clicking a workflow button
“Show numbers” → wait → scan 60 overlays → “47” → wrong element → “Undo” → “Show numbers” → wait → “52” → correct button
~18 seconds per button click
“I have to say ‘show numbers,’ memorize 60 overlays, pick one, hope it’s right, and start over when it isn’t. Using my voice should be easier than a keyboard. Not harder.”
— Priya

After Accord

Accord’s Voice Control Mode gives every interactive element in the DMS a unique, speakable name. “Open contract” opens the right document. “Send to review” advances the workflow. “Add note” opens the annotation field. No number overlays, no scanning.

Accord maps 40+ common legal workflow phrases to the firm’s DMS controls — phrases Priya actually uses, not ones IT invented. When she dictates a new clause and says “insert here,” the cursor is already where it needs to be.

Navigation commands dropped by 70%. Priya now drafts contracts at close to the pace she typed at before her injury. More importantly, the voice interface finally feels like an upgrade rather than a workaround.

After — with Accord
“Open contract W-482” → document opens • “Add review note” → note field appears • “Send to partner” → workflow advances
70% fewer navigation commands — voice-first at full speed
“I said ‘send to review’ and it just sent it. I’ve been trying to do that without clicking for two years. I didn’t realize how much energy I was spending on navigation until I didn’t have to anymore.”
— Priya, three weeks after Accord deployment
Voice Control Mode — Priya
W-482 — Carver
W-481 — Osei
W-479 — Liu
Listening — “Send to partner review”
Send to Review
Add Note
Close
Accord mapped 42 voice commands to this view
🔍
Screen Magnification Profile

David

Financial Analyst — Westfield Credit Union
Macular degeneration 350% magnification 9 years in finance Reviews 30+ accounts/day High-contrast theme

Before Accord

David has central vision loss from macular degeneration. At the 350% magnification he needs, most financial software becomes a fragmented puzzle. The account dashboard shows him data — but the column headers are off-screen. He can see numbers without knowing what they represent.

Dropdown menus open beyond the viewport edge and disappear. Tooltips vanish before he can read them. Each account review requires pan-scrolling back and forth to mentally reconstruct the layout — enormous cognitive overhead on top of already demanding analytical work.

His workaround: copy data into a separate spreadsheet and label columns by hand. He spends the first 10 minutes of every review just building a readable version of data that already exists on screen.

Before — reviewing one account
Pan left → header visible → pan right → data visible → pan left → lose place → repeat for every column → copy to spreadsheet
10 minutes of setup before analysis can begin
“I can see the numbers fine. What I can’t see is whether they’re deposits or withdrawals, because the header is off-screen at my zoom level. I’ve been copying data into a spreadsheet just to label my own columns.”
— David

After Accord

Accord’s Magnification Mode reflowes the account dashboard into a single-column layout at high zoom, without breaking any functionality. Column headers stay pinned at the top of the viewport regardless of scroll position. Dropdowns open inward. Tooltips are replaced with persistent inline labels that don’t disappear.

David can read a full account at 350% with the same flow a colleague gets at 100% — top to bottom, no horizontal scrolling, no reconstruction. He stopped building workaround spreadsheets the first day.

His account review time dropped from 18 minutes to 7 minutes on average. More significantly, his error rate on flagged anomalies dropped by 40% — because he can now see context and data together, instead of trying to hold both in working memory.

After — with Accord
Single-column layout • headers always visible • all data top-to-bottom • inline labels • zero horizontal scrolling
18 min → 7 min per review — 40% fewer missed anomalies
“The first time I saw the reflow layout I thought something had broken. Then I realized I could just… read it. Top to bottom. The header and the number on the same screen at the same time. That’s all I needed.”
— David, one week after Accord deployment
Magnification Mode — David (350%)
Account — Pinned Header
Balance
$14,820.44
Last Transaction
Deposit — $2,400.00 — Nov 28
Status
✓ Good Standing
Switch Access Profile

Amara

Data Entry Specialist — Northern Logistics Group
Cerebral palsy — spastic diplegia 2-switch scanning 6 years in data entry Processes 80+ shipment records/day Custom seating setup

Before Accord

Amara uses a 2-button switch interface to navigate everything on her computer. One switch advances the scan highlight; the other selects. She’s fast, efficient, and has been doing data entry for six years. The software is the problem.

The logistics portal scans in DOM order. That means Amara must advance through 34 navigation items, 12 filter buttons, and 4 sort controls before the scan reaches her first data entry field. On a good day it takes 45 seconds of scanning just to start working. On a bad day, she activates the wrong element and the page navigates away — starting the whole scan from the top.

She processes the same volume as her colleagues, but her hands ache by afternoon — not from data entry, but from the 50 switch presses it takes to get there.

Before — reaching first data field
Scan 34 nav items → scan 12 filters → scan 4 sort buttons → reach first input field
~50 switch presses — ~45 seconds before work begins
“By 2pm my hand hurts from switching. Not because of the data entry — because I have to scan past everything that isn’t data entry to get there. The actual work is fine. The navigation is exhausting.”
— Amara

After Accord

Accord’s Switch Access Mode restructures the scan order so data entry fields form a priority group that appears first. Navigation, filters, and sort controls are collapsed into a secondary group Amara can skip entirely. She reaches her first input in 3 scans.

Accord also labels each scan group before it begins: “Data Entry — 4 items” tells Amara exactly what’s in the group before she enters it. She never activates the wrong section by mistake. When she finishes a record, the next record’s first field is automatically focused.

Her error rate dropped significantly — fewer accidental navigations away from the form. Her afternoon fatigue dropped more. For the first time in six years, she consistently clears her full queue before end of day.

After — with Accord
“Data Entry — 4 items” → advance → advance → select first field
6 switch presses — ~5 seconds — 88% reduction in navigation overhead
“I finished my full queue before lunch. That hasn’t happened in the three years I’ve been doing this job. I didn’t even know my queue was that manageable.”
— Amara, two weeks after Accord deployment
Switch Access Mode — Amara
▶ Data Entry — 4 items — press to enter group
Navigation — 34 items
Filters & Sort — 16 items
3 scans to first data field — Accord Switch Mode active
👁
Eye Tracking Profile

Tom

Customer Service Representative — Meridian Insurance
ALS — progressive motor neuron disease Tobii Dynavox eye tracker 14 years in insurance Handles 25+ customer calls/day Eye-only input

Before Accord

Tom was diagnosed with ALS four years ago. He still wants to work — his employer wants to support him — but the insurance CRM was not designed with dwell-click users in mind. Buttons are 18×18 pixels. Interactive elements cluster together with 2-pixel gaps.

Dropdown menus close before his 800ms dwell registers a click. He activates the wrong record an average of 12 times per shift. Each mistake requires a chain of dwell actions to undo. By early afternoon, his eyes are strained to the point of headaches and he has to stop for 30-minute rests.

His employer has been asking, gently, whether he wants to reduce his hours. Tom doesn’t. The software is the problem, not his capacity.

Before — typical afternoon
18px button targets • 12+ accidental activations/shift • dropdown closes at 750ms • must re-open • eye strain and headache by 2pm • 30-minute rest breaks
“The buttons are tiny. I click things I didn’t mean to click ten times a day. Then I have to fix those mistakes with more eye movements. By the afternoon I can barely keep my eyes open.”
— Tom

After Accord

Accord’s Eye Tracking Mode enlarges every interactive element in the CRM to a minimum 44×44px dwell target. A 200ms gap buffer between adjacent elements prevents accidental activation when his gaze passes between buttons. Dropdown dwell windows extend to 1200ms — enough time for a reliable click.

A soft visual ring shows Tom where his gaze is dwelling and fills in as the dwell timer progresses — giving him clear feedback without demanding more eye movement. When a dwell activates accidentally, a 1-second undo window appears at a corner of the screen.

Accidental activations dropped from 12 per shift to under 4. Tom now works a full day without the afternoon rest breaks. He told his manager he doesn’t want reduced hours. The software finally agrees.

After — with Accord
44px minimum dwell targets • 200ms gap buffers • 1200ms dwell windows • visual dwell ring • 1-second undo on misfire
12 accidental activations → fewer than 4 — full shift without forced rest breaks
“I can work a full day now. The targets are big enough that I’m not fighting the interface just to click something. My employer kept asking if I wanted to reduce my hours. Now I don’t.”
— Tom, one month after Accord deployment
Eye Tracking Mode — Tom
Open Record
Add Note
Escalate
44px targets — 200ms gap buffer — 1200ms dwell — Accord Eye Mode active
Dwell progress: ██████████ 80%

Your Workers

Who in your organization is quietly struggling?

Most workers with disabilities don’t disclose. They build workarounds. They fall behind and assume it’s their fault. Accord gives organizations a way to help before anyone has to ask.